Application Security Testing
Top Coverity SAST Alternatives and Competitors

Looking to upgrade or change your solution? Take away the guesswork and stay informed with end user feedback to identify and select the solution that best matches your needs.

Coverity is a fast, accurate, and highly scalable static analysis (SAST) solution that helps development and security teams address security and quality defects early in the software development life cycle (SDLC), track and manage risks across the application portfolio, and ensure compliance with security and coding standards.

7.5

Composite
Score

+99

Emotional
Footprint

10

Reviews

Best Alternatives and Competitors to Coverity SAST

Compare how Coverity SAST stacks up to the competition in the areas that matter most to real users to short list options that will best fit your business needs.

GitLab Inc.

GitLab

8.9

Composite
Score

+98

Emotional
Footprint

94

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, GitLab is:

More Respectful

Better at Support

Better at Training

Easier to Implement

Better at Integrating

Less Transparent

SonarSource SA

SonarQube

8.4

Composite
Score

+94

Emotional
Footprint

40

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, SonarQube is:

More Respectful

Better at Support

Better at Training

Less Reliable

Less Efficient

Less Innovative

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

8.1

Composite
Score

+97

Emotional
Footprint

58

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, GitGuardian is:

More Respectful

Better at Support

Better at Training

Worse at Integrating

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Qualys Inc.

Qualys TotalAppSec

7.9

Composite
Score

+95

Emotional
Footprint

13

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, Qualys TotalAppSec is:

More Respectful

Better at Support

Less Transparent

Harder to Customize

Less Inspiring

Less Caring

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

7.7

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

23

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is:

More Respectful

Better at Support

Less Efficient

Less Caring

Less Reliable

Less Innovative

Black Duck

Black Duck Polaris

7.5

Composite
Score

+90

Emotional
Footprint

16

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, Black Duck Polaris is:

Better at Training

Less Caring

Less Efficient

Less Reliable

Harder to Use

Less Transparent

Veracode

Veracode Static Analysis

7.5

Composite
Score

+88

Emotional
Footprint

18

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, Veracode Static Analysis is:

More Respectful

Less Reliable

Less Transparent

Less Inspiring

Less Efficient

Less Caring

OpenText Corporation

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

7.3

Composite
Score

+82

Emotional
Footprint

18

Reviews

Reviews Say

Compared to Coverity SAST, OpenText Static Application Security Testing is:

More Respectful

Better at Training

Less Transparent

Less Reliable

Less Caring

Worse at Integrating

Most Popular Coverity SAST Comparisons